In california,



CDC or HIV centers/ California health department/los angeles would call/contact a person if a person shows up as HIV positive and they had exposed some partners, correct?



honestly, do u think someone would lie about having HIV when they tested positive and say they havent infected someone???



i was raped by a hiv negative person at the time..he was "formal friend" well now, hes in jail.. but i wonder.. if he would of lied to tell the doctors not to contact me if I am exposed? bc while im sitting here waiting to see if imma die or not, i havent got a call yet from them sayin he exposed me!?

When I tested HIV  here in Australia, my doctor and counsellor contacted my previous partners and boyfriends and advised them that one of their previous partners tested positive. They don't give out names etc.



They then recommend the person to get themselves tested.

I'm sorry, I know you are upset and anxious but I simply didn't understand all of your post. If you have been raped you should be tested regardless of him being tested.  The earliest you can test for HIV antibodies is about 6 weeks. But later is more accurate. IF you were exposed to the virus it takes time for yoru body to react with antibodies so the longer the period later, the more accurate. I know those would be the longest several weeks or months in your life but you'll need an accurate answer. If you get tested at 6 weeks and it's negative, you can't be sure it will stay negative weeks or months later. If you test positive at that point, it's well, postive.



In any case, YOU need to get tested and you will get the results back for your tests. If you are relying on him to tell the authorities that you may be exposed, well, you already know what kind of man he is.



I wish the best for you.